4 responses to “Todd Drezner: Cinema Libre Studio and “Vaxxed”

  1. Bb

    Sent from my iPhone

    On Mar 31, 2016, at 5:19 PM, Cortical Chauvinism wrote:

    WordPress.com m0casa02 posted: “Below is an open letter by Todd Drezner, director of Loving Lamposts, to Cinema Libre the distributors of Andrew Wakefield’s VAXXED. Dear Cinema Libre, I’m writing to explain why I’m so disa… Source: Todd Drezner: Cinema Libre Studio and “Vaxxed””

    Like

  2. The trailer of this film is appalling, but then far more so has been the huge trail of bad faith and deceits from those on the correct side of the vax-caused-autism-catastrophe dispute. Dr Wakefield was an honest honourable gastro researcher who just happened to be even more incompetent in epidemiology than the average piece of claptrap paraded in NEJM, JAMA or Pediatrics as supposedly top expert science. But being incompetent is no crime in science.

    Wakefield’s main defect was naivety, such that as a very successful medical professional he did not understand that even suggesting there might be a vax-autism causation would get the full weight of the character-assassination police set upon him. There was not the slightest fraud in his 1998 case study. There was certainly unforgivable criminality in the huge system of lies set up to attack its author and lie to people that it should be retracted.

    If “authorities” such as CDC, FDA, GMC were not all gangs of lying crooks, and supposedly top journals had not wantonly published deceitful trash such as Madsen, Thorson etc, this vacccine controversy could have been settled long ago. But instead the disinformation system was set to full steam, and consequently ample authentic proof was provided to any observant observer that the medical authoritocracy was lying about the subject. And once you’ve lost the people’s trust you aren’t going to get it back again. The blame lies entirely with the medical establishment. And by the way, they have even lied about supposed measles epidemics being “caused” by the vax refusal. A telling leak about the pseudoscience of vaccinations is the following recently published in a top peer-reviewed journal (Wang et al., 2014), which lays bare the utter criminality of the vaccine scam industry..

    “The reported coverage of the measles–rubella (MR) or measles–mumps–rubella (MMR) vaccine is greater than 99% in Zhejiang province. However, the incidence of measles, mumps, and rubella remains high. …. measles, mumps, and rubella remain common diseases throughout Zhejiang province. …. Therefore, the elimination of measles and control of mumps and rubella are urgent public health priorities in local regions.”
    Wang, Z., Yan, R., He, H., Li, Q., Chen, G., Yang, S., & Chen, E. (2014). Difficulties in Eliminating Measles and Controlling Rubella and Mumps: A Cross-Sectional Study of a First Measles and Rubella Vaccination and a Second Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Vaccination. PLoS ONE, 9(2), e89361. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089361

    Note that this report is telling us that not just one but all three famous infections (measles, mumps and rubella) have not been effectively countered even by 99% coverage (in double dose) of those vaccinations in a population of 50 million. Time to end all this lying in medical “research”.

    Like

  3. Some people are arguing that this is not censorship because it is not being done by the government and instead by a private organisation and they would be free to publish elsewhere. But that is a specious and unworthy argument. If everyone had equal access to produce their own equally-famous film festivals, media channels and so on, then the argument might have some merit. But in the present world, the preponderant huge slice of public visibility is controlled by a very small proportion of the population. Even worse, the physical “public places” now amount to little more than highways where no-one can even get out of their car from let alone usefully discuss anything. All the potential places for open public discussion are tending to be privatised shopping malls and such like corporate clap where free speech is subject to “moderation” in reality censorship. And same with major websites.
    And in that circumstance, those who have such heavy control over public discourse are as good as matters acting as government censors if they exclude some item on a basis of not liking its content.
    A far better way of handling this trash film would have been to let it be screened and let it be torn apart and subjected to a counter-film. But no, the kneejerk of these people is to suppress, suppress and suppress, not least because presenting a credible honest account of their own side is beyond their nature, for reasons of lack of their own honesty.
    Shame on this system of crooks in which the honest get persecuted as criminals while the criminals get honoured as heroes. Rightly held in contempt by so many.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s